Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Electricity from Renewable Energy Sources, Queensland, Australia

Galina Alexandra Ivanova

Abstract


The results of a survey of Queensland households regarding their willingness to pay (WTP) for renewable energy and support the Mandatory Renewable Energy Target (MRET) policy are presented. Results suggest that respondents were willing to pay more for the electricity generated from the renewable energy for several reasons including the emissions reduction and the benefits of future generations. On average the respondents were willing to pay about $22/quarter to support the increase in electricity generation from renewable energy sources in support of the MRET. The mean for voluntary contributions to increase the generation of electricity from renewable energy sources was $28/quarter. Furthermore, the respondents who hold the perception that a particular electricity generation technology does negatively affect the environment had a significantly different WTP compared to respondents holding the perceptions that the technology does not negatively affect the environment. Finally, respondents were willing to pay significantly more if voluntary payments were made possible compared to the MRET imposts. Therefore, the consumer driven purchases can, in part, support the future of renewable generation capacity in Queensland. However, the reliance upon other policy alternatives may be needed. The results indicate that a more effective renewable energy policy reflecting these preferences can be put in place.


Keywords


renewable energy; willingness to pay; voluntary; MRET; Queensland

Full Text:

PDF

References


DCCEE (2012) Australian National Greenhouse Accounts, Quarterly Update of Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory, March Quarter 2012, http://www.climatechange.gov.au/~/media/climate-change/emissions/2012-mar/NationalGreenhouseGasInventory-QuarterlyReport-March2012.pdf

ABARES (2011) Energy in Australia 2011, Australian Government, Department of Resources Energy and Tourism (http://www.ret.gov.au/energy/Documents/facts-stats-pubs/Energy-in-Australia-2011.pdf)

PC (2012). Australia’s electricity generation sector, Productivity Commission (PC), http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/109921/13-carbon-prices-appendixd.pdf

AEMO (2012) Average Price Tables: Average annual prices (per financial year), Australian Energy Market Operator, http://www.aemo.com.au/electricity/NEM-Data/Average-Price-Tables.aspx

Australian Government (2000) ‘Renewable Energy (Electricity) Act 2000’, Australian Government, Canberra.

DCCEE (2010) Renewable Energy Target, Australian Government, Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, http://www.climatechange.gov.au/government/initiatives/renewable-target.aspx

ABS (2009) Are Households using renewable energy? Australian Bureau of Statistics, 4102.0- Australian Social Trends, March 2009, http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features80March%202009

Green Power (2011) ‘National GreenPower Accreditation Program Status Report’, Green Power, Australia, http://www.greenpower.gov.au/ ~/media /Business %20Centre/Quarterly%20Reports/2011Q1Report.pdf.

Roe, B., Teisl, M., Levy, A. and Russell, M. (2001) ‘US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity’, Energy Policy, 29(11), pp. 917-25.

Eikeland, P. (1998), ‘Electricity market liberalization and environmental performance: Norway and the UK’, Energy Policy, 26(12), pp. 917-27.

Rowlands, I., Scott, D. and Parker, P. (2001), ‘Ready to go green?: The prospects for premium-priced green electricity in Waterloo Region, Ontario’, Environments, 28(3), pp. 1-119.

Batley, S., Colbourne, D., Fleming, P. and Urwin, P. (2001) ‘Citizen versus consumer: challenges in the UK green power market’, Energy Policy, 29(6), pp. 479-87.

Fahrar, B. (1999) ‘Willingness to pay for electricity form renewable resources: a review of utility market research’, NREL, Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP. 550.26148.

Mitchel, R. and Carson, R. (1989) ‘Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method’, Resources for the future, John Hopkins University Press.

Hanemann, M. (1994) ‘Valuing the environment through contingent valuation’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), pp. 19-43.

Hoehn, J. and Randall, A. (1987) ‘Satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 14(3), pp. 226-247.

Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Leamer, N., Radner, R. and Schuman, H. (1993) ‘Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation’, Federal Registry, 58 (10), pp.4601-14.

Bateman, I., Langford, I., Jones, A., and Kerr, G. (2001) ‘Bound and path effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation’, Resource and Energy Economics, 23(3), pp. 191-213.

Green, D., Jacowithz, K., Kahneman, D. and McFadden, D. (1998) ‘Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods’, Resource and Energy Economics, 20(2), pp. 85-116.

Ready, R.C., J.C. Buzby, and D. Hu (1996), ‘Differences between continuous and discrete contingent value estimates’, Land Economics 72(3): 397-411.




DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.20508/ijrer.v2i4.387.g6098

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Online ISSN: 1309-0127

Publisher: Gazi University

IJRER is cited in SCOPUS, EBSCO, WEB of SCIENCE (Clarivate Analytics);

IJRER has been cited in Emerging Sources Citation Index from 2016 in web of science.

WEB of SCIENCE in 2025; 

h=35,

Average citation per item=6.59

Last three Years Impact Factor=(1947+1753+1586)/(146+201+78)=5286/425=12.43

Category Quartile:Q4